V

Vigil

Explored

ABC 2026 · June — August 2026

Cross-source signal correlation layer for manufacturing maintenance — correlates alarm logs, sensor trends, and operator observations in real-time to flag developing failures before they happen.

Team Vigil

Team Members

Ritesh Minchinal

Ritesh Minchinal

Samhith R Gowda

Samhith R Gowda

Field Notes

THESIS 1: Manufacturing AI - Full Domain Mapping We started with the broadest possible question: where does AI create real value in manufacturing? We mapped the entire manufacturing ecosystem with 9 layers and 33 stakeholders. Built a power dynamics map scoring all 33 stakeholders from 1-100 based on negotiating leverage. Generated 5 deep pain points per stakeholder - 50 pain points total. Key insight: Indian auto component MSMEs are making life-or-death business decisions without any real data. Every problem - quoting, quality, setup, maintenance - is caused by the same underlying structural issue: absence of accessible, affordable operational data. --- THESIS 2: Automotive Component Manufacturing - Workflow Gap Analysis The specific gap: Every time a repeat job comes back after weeks or months, the operator redoes the setup partially from scratch. Setup that should take 45 minutes takes 2-3 hours. The first 3-10 parts are scrap. Financial impact: On a 20-machine factory running 3 jobs/machine/week - 600 problem setups per year at Rs 5,000-50,000 each = Rs 30 lakh to Rs 3 crore in preventable setup waste annually. --- THESIS 3: MRO Procurement Fraud Nobody steals Rs 50 lakh at once. They steal Rs 10,000 five thousand times. Across a factory spending Rs 25 crore/year on MRO, even 5% leakage = Rs 1.25 crore disappearing quietly every year. --- THESIS 4 (Validated): Cross-Source Signal Correlation for Manufacturing Maintenance Every machine failure has warning signs across multiple disconnected sources - sensors, alarm logs, operator observations. Nobody connects them before the failure. The problem is not absence of signals. It is absence of correlation. Validated by 6 real practitioners: - Ajesh Yadav (Pulp & Paper) - confirmed unexpected failures 2-3x per year, 20-30% cost premium on unplanned downtime. - Velmurugan Kuppusamy (Process Manufacturing) - confirmed signals are "underestimated, not properly documented, or not linked together." - Prashannt N. Chinchkhede (Steel plant) - confirmed spare parts asymmetry: cheap component causing hours of expensive downtime. - Anonymous Reddit (r/manufacturing) - confirmed AI pilot death pattern: operators drift back to old ways within weeks. The validated solution: A cross-source signal correlation layer using existing plant data - alarm logs, condition monitoring, sensor trends, operator observations - cross-referenced automatically in real time. When signals match a historical failure pattern, it flags the developing problem before failure occurs. No new sensors required. Zero behaviour change for operators.

Notes & Reflections

The people who are crazy enough to think they can change the world are the ones who do.

Ritesh Minchinal

Failure is an option here. If things are not failing, you are not innovating enough.

Samhith R Gowda

Domains

ManufacturingAI & ML

Margin Note

Manufacturing + AI: Find a specific, expensive factory problem → identify the current workaround → check if there is a real GAP → check if it is FEASIBLE to build → check if it is WORTHWHILE enough for customers to pay → start with a narrow industry/use case → prove ROI → expand.

Also in ABC 2026